Refunds & expensesLetterEU261 · UK261

No-Show Clause: Airline Cancelled My Return Flight

Missed the outbound and the airline voided your return? No CJEU ruling exists, but Spain's Supreme Court struck the clause down. Letter to demand carriage.

Use this if you did not fly one leg of a return or multi-leg ticket and the airline cancelled the rest of it. Not sure? Check in 30 seconds →

Fill in the blanks — the letter updates as you type

20 blanks to fill

6 letters and numbers, like ABC123.

Everything you type stays in this browser. Nothing is sent anywhere — there is no server to send it to. It is gone when you close the tab.

A no-show clause lets an airline cancel the rest of a ticket when you do not fly one leg of it. There is no Court of Justice ruling on the clause. Spain’s Supreme Court confirmed that Iberia’s version was void in a case brought by the consumer organisation OCU. The letter below asks for carriage, or the money.

[Your full name]
[Your address]
[Email]
[Phone]

[Today's date]

[Airline name] — Customer Relations / Claims
[Airline claims address or online claim form]

Re: Cancellation of the return leg after a missed outbound flight
Booking reference [Booking reference]
Outbound flight [First flight number] on [Original flight date]
Return flight [Second flight number] on [Flight date]
Route [Departure airport] to [Final destination airport]
Your reference [Reference number]

Dear Sir or Madam,

I hold a confirmed booking, reference [Booking reference], covering
flight [First flight number] and flight [Second flight number]. I did
not travel on [First flight number] on [Original flight date]. You have
[cancelled / declared void] the remaining flight on the booking.

I paid for both flights. Not using one of them did not reduce your cost
of carrying me on the other, and I ask you to honour the booking.

The term you rely on was not individually negotiated with me. Please
identify it by number in your conditions of carriage and explain the
basis on which you say it binds me. I put you on notice that terms of
this kind have been held unenforceable by national courts, and that I
will refer this to the competent consumer authority.

I therefore ask you, within 14 days:

  1. To restore my reservation on [Second flight number], or to carry me
     on the next available flight on that route at no extra charge; or
  2. Failing that, to refund the unused portion of the ticket,
     [Currency] [Refund amount], to [Payment details].

If you refuse both, please say so in writing and give your reasons, so
that I can put your answer before the authority and, if necessary, a
court.

Yours faithfully,

[Signature]
[Your full name]

How to use it

  1. Send it the moment you know you will miss the outbound, and before the return date if you can.
  2. Ask for carriage first and money second. It is much cheaper for the airline to reinstate a seat than to argue.
  3. Quote the booking reference and both flight numbers, so nobody can treat it as two separate tickets.
  4. Ask for the clause by its number. A term the airline will not identify is a term it will not defend.
  5. Keep the reply. Whichever way it goes, it is the document your consumer body or your court reads.

Write before you rebook. While the return still exists you are asking for a seat, which the airline can simply give you. Once you have bought a replacement ticket you are asking for damages instead, which is a slower and much more contested claim. If you have already flown home on someone else’s aircraft, the realistic ask is the refund of the unused leg, not the cost of the new ticket.

Is the no-show clause illegal everywhere in the EU?

Not settled. We found no Court of Justice ruling on it, and we have not verified rulings outside Spain, so this page does not claim one. What is verified is that the First Chamber of the Spanish Supreme Court confirmed the nullity of Iberia’s no-show clause in collective proceedings brought by the consumer organisation OCU, as recorded in the judiciary’s own press note. Elsewhere the argument runs through national law implementing Directive 93/13/EEC, under which a term not individually negotiated that creates a significant imbalance is not binding on the consumer. Ask your national enforcement body or European Consumer Centre what the courts in your country have decided.

Does EU261 help here?

Not directly. Regulation 261/2004 pays for cancellations by the airline, denied boarding and long delays; it does not regulate what a contract may say about unused legs. Whether refusing to carry a passenger who holds a valid reservation on the return is denied boarding under the regulation is a question we have not seen decided, so the letter argues contract and unfair terms and keeps the regulation out of it. If the airline itself then cancels the return flight, the ordinary rules apply and the refund or re-route letter is the right one.

Can I buy a new ticket and claim the cost back?

You can ask, and airlines sometimes pay. But that is a damages claim, and it is harder than asking for the seat you already bought: you have to show the loss was caused by the airline’s breach and that you kept it reasonable. Buy the cheapest sensible replacement, keep every receipt, and claim it in the same letter as the refund of the unused leg.

If the airline refuses, escalate. The route for an EU or UK carrier is in escalate to the regulator; if the sum justifies it, the letter before claim is the step before issuing, and time limits by country tells you how long you have. Where the two legs were bought as separate tickets rather than one booking, the analysis changes completely — read separate tickets and missed connections instead.

What to do next

  1. RF 02Cash Refund, Not a Voucher: EU261 Article 8 LetterA cancelled flight must be refunded within 7 days in cash or by bank transfer — a voucher only if you agree in writing. Copy-paste Article 8 letter.Letter
  2. EX 02Airline Refused Your Claim? Escalate to the RegulatorFree routes after a refusal: the national enforcement body, a binding UK ADR decision within 12 months, the DOT, a chargeback, or small claims.Guide
  3. EX 05Letter Before Claim: Final Demand to an Airline14 days to pay before you issue: a letter before claim built to the England and Wales Pre-Action Conduct Practice Direction, plus Scotland and Ireland.Letter

Where this comes from

  1. Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts · regulation
  2. Consejo General del Poder Judicial — Tribunal Supremo confirms the nullity of clauses in Iberia's flight contracts (OCU action) · caselaw
  3. Regulation (EC) No 261/2004, Article 8 · regulation

Every figure on this page was checked against the sources above on 6 September 2026.

Written and fact-checked by the flightclaimletters editorial team. We are not lawyers and this is not legal advice. Every figure is checked against the primary source listed above, and the date we last checked it is printed on the page. The letters are templates you send in your own name — you decide what to claim. If money is at stake and the airline disputes the facts, take the file to your national enforcement body or to a lawyer. How we check this →

↑↓ move↵ open

Find my letter
  1. CLCompensation claims7
  2. ALBy airline30
  3. RFRefunds & expenses10
  4. BGBaggage6
  5. RTKnow your rights13
  6. XPYour situation, explained11
  7. EXIf they refuse9
  8. CPHonest comparisons2

Keyboard

⌘/ctrl+K or /
Search every letter and guide
j / k
Move through a list
c
On a letter page: copy the letter
t
Light / dark
?
This list